
Home | All about HIOW | Members and Officers | Association meeting dates | Key documents | Links | Election Results | Responses | Officer Networks | Other Useful Information |
Back to 2004 Meetings Index | Back to Agenda Page
Paper 8 - 16 July 2004 Meeting
ASSOCIATION OF HAMPSHIRE AND ISLE OF WIGHT LOCAL AUTHORITIES
16 July 2004
SECOND GENERATION LOCAL PUBLIC SERVICE AGREEMENT
Report by the Chief Executive of Hampshire County Council
________________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION
That the Association agrees the themes and issues, as
outlined in the attached document, for developing a "second generation
Local Public Service Agreement" for Hampshire.
________________________________________________________________________
INTRODUCTION
1. The guidelines the for second generation Local Public
Service Agreements (LPSAs) make significant changes to the rules and procedures
which are welcomed:
- Local - There are no requirements for national targets. LPSA2 should
reflect the priorities of the local strategic partnership and community
strategy, CPA outcomes and local performance information. This must be
evidenced.
- Partners - Government will not agree LPSAs with County Councils without the involvement of those Districts who are willing to be involved. There is also the expectation that other public sector agencies, community and voluntary sectors and Local Strategic Partnerships (LSPs) will be partners. The LPSA will still formally be an agreement between the Government and the County Council.
- Government - Government departments are committed to greater involvement with potential for local arms of government and the opportunity for ‘explorer’ partnerships where Government works alongside local authorities on specific targets.
- LPSA 2 retains the same system for pump priming and a potential award grant of 2½% of budget.
PROCESS
2. The process for LPSA2 is longer with two main stages:
Stage One:
- agree desired improvement priorities and outcomes with
partners as framework for LPSA2
- agree framework with Government (ODPM) by end July.
Stage Two:
Once agreed, this framework document sets the basis for developing the detailed LPSA targets by November for the start of the negotiations on performance and stretch. This more detailed work will include:
- developing indicators to measure outcomes for priority
areas to be targeted, including data collection issues
- agreeing indicators with Government
- agreeing performance targets with Government
- agreeing how Government will work in partnership
3. The basis of the agreement will still be a negotiated assessment of
performance without LPSA2 and the stretch which will be achieved through LPSA2.
PROGRESS TO DATE
4. Consultation has taken place with all District Councils and a working
group formed of representatives from districts, the county council and the
voluntary sector. District Councils have undertaken to involve LSPs in the
process and the County Council has discussed priorities with the Hampshire
Strategic Partnership. Other partners are now to be involved in more detailed
discussions. 5. Following agreement that the initial framework document should
be based around the four key themes of the Hampshire Community Strategy,
particularly where these reflect the key priorities from district level LSPs,
working groups, led by district councils (Basingstoke & Deane, Rushmoor,
Havant and Eastleigh), met to refine a structure for the LPSA and to start to
identify the key improvement priorities, issues, and therefore potential
targets, for inclusion in the LPSA. 6. The ODPM has confirmed it is expecting
LPSA2 targets to be outcome-focused. This means that the partnership will be
measured on indicators that are not directly related to the process of delivery
of services but on the beneficial outcomes that people would expect the public
sector to deliver. This will require a different approach from LPSA1 and will
need further work by the partners over the months until detailed submission in
November.
7. The result of the discussions to date are shown in the Annex to this report.
This draft framework identifies four main headline improvement priorities, each
with two or three areas of focus for potential action and investment. Outcome
targets have been identified at the headline level only at this stage and the
work needed will identify the more detailed targets and the indicators to
measure these targets. The group also acknowledges that the final framework will
need to be presented in a cross cutting way and demonstrate the impact of issues
such as accessibility, equalities and sustainability on the target areas. This
further work will also need to reflect the geographical or specific community
target group emphasis for the targets as necessary.
8. Four working groups have now been set up to develop outcome targets and
indicators for each headline priority. It is important that all interested
parties are fully involved in these working groups to ensure their priorities
are brought into the discussions and reflected as appropriate in the detailed
LPSA document. There will also be a group considering accessibility issues and
the HIOW Strategic Housing Officers’ Group has been asked to look at possible
targets for housing. A fifth group, led by the County Council, will look in more
detail at management issues.9. It is proposed that this framework document forms
the basis of the Hampshire submission to the ODPM in July.
PETER ROBERTSON
Chief Executive, Hampshire County Council
Date: 29 June 2004
Annex: 1
Contact: Jill Lovelock, Tel.01963 847591, jill.lovelock@hants.gov.uk
Paddy Hillary, Tel. 01962 847391, paddy.hillary@hants.gov.uk
ANNEX
Improvement Priorities
Main Priority 1: Tackling Barriers to Recruitment in Hampshire
Increase the employment rates of disadvantaged groups and areas and significantly reduce the difference between their employment rates and the overall rate.
|
Potential target areas: |
||
|
Targeted action to increase numbers achieving educational/skills qualifications |
Business Support
Increase the number of enterprises and their longevity |
Employment Support Improve support for employment through increased childcare/ housing/transport |
|
Potential indicator activities: |
||
|
Training and retraining |
Support for new industries |
Childcare |
|
Skills development |
Seed bed business follow on accommodation |
Carer support |
|
Targeted - Older people |
Resource management |
Key worker/affordable housing |
|
Educational attainment
|
Broad band |
Public transport |
|
Improved transport provision |
Main Priority 2: Helping People Feel Safe
Reduce anti social behaviour
|
Potential target areas: |
|
|
Environmental Creating an environment where people feel safe and deterring anti social behaviour |
Social Improve regulation/enforcement and provision of diversionary facilities |
|
Potential indicators activities: |
|
|
Lighting |
Underage/drinking/alcohol |
|
CCTV |
Licensing |
|
Graffiti (zero tolerance) |
"Evening Economy" |
|
Vehicle crime/abandoned |
Enhanced recreational facilities |
|
Anti-social behaviour |
|
Community Wardens - ? infrastructure?
Main Priority 3: Promote Healthy Communities
Improving the health of the people of Hampshire and increasing participation in local communities
|
Reducing obesity levels in school age children OR reducing emergency hospital admission of older people
|
Community Increasing the number of volunteers/Increasing parental involvement in schools/increasing local involvement in community governance |
|
Potential indicator activities: |
|
|
Dentists |
Volunteering |
|
Obesity |
*Market town/ parish plans/community involvement |
|
Smoking |
Community capital/capacity |
|
Health education
|
Older people |
|
Volunteering |
|
*Could be explorer partnership
Main Priority 4: [Sustain] Hampshire’s Unique Environment
Maintaining the quality and environmental balance between rural and urban
areas and making best use of natural resources
|
Potential target areas: |
||
|
Natural Protecting the countryside and making it work |
Environment Quality Making best use of natural resources |
Built Increasing the liveability of urban (and rural) areas. |
|
Potential indicator activities: |
||
|
Farm diversification |
Landfill |
Enhance liveability |
|
Sustainable local food |
Composting |
Street scene |
|
Multi functional countryside |
Congestion |
Street cleaning |
|
Countryside - protect and make it work |
Waste/recycling |
Unfit housing |
|
Tourism |
Resource Management |
Degraded environment |
|
Land Management |
Coastal |
Housing |
|
Housing |
Flooding |
|
|
Pollution/air/water quality |
||
![]()
| Last update: | 07/07/2004 |
| Author: | Nick Goulder, Director |

| TOP OF PAGE |